Er zullen vast ongelukken gebeuren met wapens, maar voor kinderen die er mee gaan schieten hebben we iets als een veiligheidspin. 'Guns don't kill people... people kill people'.
Een crimineel staat op voorsprong als je de burgers verbiedt om wapens of geweld te gebruiken. Een crimineel gaat mijn huis niet levend of heel verlaten. Risico van het 'vak'. Ben Nederlander en hou me aan de Nederlandse wet, dus geen (illegaal) vuurwapen. Maar ach, een bijl en een kapmes mogen wel....

This video is so stupid. Better they film in a Liquor Store and talk about how "This Brand of Vodka" caused Daddy to die of liver cancer, "That Brand of Whiskey" caused Mommy to die in a DUI crash.

Ja bijl en een kapmes zijn ook gemaakt om iemands lichaam te vernielen. Liever vuurwapens voor diegene die er goed voor getraind zijn: Militair, politie, marsauche etc. Een kind ziet het gevaar niet van een vuurwapen en het is makkelijk om er dodelijke verwonding mee te verichten. Een vuurwapen heeft ook een psychologische gemak, dat is dat je een grote afstand kunt hebben van het slachtoffer. Wapens bestaan nu eenmaal, zover ik kan oordelen is de regelgeving hierover in nederland verstandig.

So we should ban liquor and legalize guns?

Uh guns are already legal, and booze kills and rips apart more families than guns, that's my point. Could easily make a dumb "shock video" about booze too.

Zou hij zelf weten dat hij dat op biertijd komt posten ? ;-)

In 'murica mag je zo'n ding ook gewoon onder je kussen bewaren... Als ik me niet vergis moet in Nederland het wapen apart van de kogels bewaard worden in een kluis. En een aparte kluis voor de kogels. Dan gebeurt een ongelukje in elk geval nooit.

@Yolky...............You are just empty-headed.
Try to read and understand (and that can be difficult for you) this article and find out why you can't help it to think this way....http://www.z24.nl/bijzaken/...

Youtube "open carry" maar eens, en je ziet hoe krom het denken is.

Kick dat de verkoper in de winkel het personage en de stem is van een karakter in een behoorlijk gewelddadig videospel genaamd GTA5. Als gamer kan je in de huid kruipen van Michael De Santa en zoveel mensen kapot schieten als je zelf wilt :P..

@flupke85, inderdaad waar. Het punt is ook dat mensen te makkelijk eraan komen en er argeloos mee omgaan, hierdoor komen dit soort dingen zo vaak voor. Als je het soort en aantal wapens beperkt tot agenten en andere (hopelijk) verantwoordelijke mensen, inclusief de eis van kluis etc, voorkom je een hoop.

@Screen cleaner....

You sound like a knee jerk, left wing, pot smoking liberal (like the media sources you are soooo mesmerized by) when you attack persons like Yolky for having a difference of opinion. The whole video is a joke. I'm willing to bet nearly ALL guns known by law enforcement to have a "history" are locked away in evidence facilities or destroyed, especially in New York!
Furthermore, a quick Google search will reveal to you that the death toll by firearms in the US in 2013 was about 11,000, a large portion of which were suicides. During the same period of time, approximately 88,000 persons were put to the grave by alcohol.
There are over 300,000,000 firearms in the US. Avg about 6.4 per household according to one survey. I happen to own a few more that that, and none of my guns have a "history" other than providing MEAT for my family. (I suppose you're a vegan as well as under informed)

This is clever, even slick. I'm not a gun enthusiast yet I believe the constitutional founders intended the second amendment as a deterrent to the tyranny of an rogue federal government. Our American national elections are a farce, special interests control Washington, the power elite and 1%ers never get prosecuted and the electorate is largely disenfranchised from government. Since 9-11 local police have become increasingly paramilitary many local departments federally subsidized, contingency maneuvers like Jade Helm in anticipation of civil unrest, martial law. Mind control has played a role in at least some mass shootings. Sandy Hook was not as portrayed. If the government was representative of the will of our lamentably apathetic and over-medicated citizens and not an agent of a NWO agenda then gun ownership wouldn't be so important. True, some of these case studies are tragic because of the owners sloppiness yet Big Pharma plays a huge role in gun violence. Switzerland (a far less violent nation) has citizens who quietly own guns too. I love life and hate gun violence but would defend my family against an oppressive government.

Yosemite Sam | 31 Aug '15 | 18:01

Providing meat for my family... LMFAO.

Better to have a pot smoking neighbour then a trigger happy neighbour who loves to provide meat for his family. Just go to a butcher if you want some meat.

And no I do not smoke pot.

hengel

Looonie
Why pay someone for a product (namely meat) that I can go out in the woods and bring home fresh (also free from synthetic hormones, antibiotics, and salmonella)?
I suppose you also LYFAO at people who enjoy fishing, or growing their own vegetables.
If you don't have the stomach or ambition to take life of animal for food, stick with tofu; going to the butcher simply makes you a hypocrite, not superior. You're just placing the uncomfortable killing part in someone else's hands.
If you choose not to own guns, that's just fine. A lot of defenseless people feel the same way, and they seem to congregate in large metropolitan areas. As for trigger happy neighbors, I get along with mine just fine, thank you. We just don't have to dial 911 and patienly hope for the best.
Congratulations on not smoking pot.

Wat is dat met al dat engelse gezeik opeens ?

ER ZIJN EEN PAAR OP HUN PIKKIE GETRAPT. LIBERAAL EN KORTZICHTIG EN HELEMAAL NIET OPENSTAAND VOOR KRITIEK.
sorry voor schreeuwen maar ik heb geen zin om opnieuw teschrijven. ;)

Yosemite Sam | 31 Aug '15 | 19:54

Has nothing to do with stomach or ambition. What if all humans go out and hunt? Probably in a week there is nothing left to hunt. There are too much people in relation to wild animals.
You are just stuck in the wild west, grow up.

Looonie
Not stuck in the wild west. Choose to be. As far away from the big city violence as I can afford. I agree with you there are too much (many) people. If all people hunted, gathered, farmed and fished, most would not be successful. That would solve the too "much" people problem. You're welcome to laugh your ass off while you tell me to "grow up", but I'll bet you aren't laughing when the power goes out for a week.
And by the way, your store bought organic vegetables CAME FROM THE FIELDS WE SHOOT DEER OVER so they don't eat it before you do.

Well people kill people

Looonie,
Not stuck in the wild west. Choose to be in the Midwest. As far away from the big city violence as I can afford. I agree with you there are too much (many) people. If all people hunted, gathered, farmed and fished, most would not be successful. That would solve the too "much" people problem. You're welcome to laugh your ass off while you tell me to "grow up", but I'll bet you aren't laughing when your power goes out for a week in the middle of winter...
By the way, your store bought, certified organic pesticide free vegetables CAME FROM THE FIELDS WE SHOOT WILD DEER over so they don't eat it before you do!

Panalover and moi

WWW = WORLD. WIDE. WEB. Like it or not, that includes 'muricah and all of our US of A opinions. And our "engelse geziek"

Have a nice day all beertime brothers.

+1 to all Yosemite Sam says.

Loonie just stick to eating your crap fast food and don't bother to think about where the meat actually comes from lol.

Oh, and hunting actually preserves the species by the way. Why do you think Elephants are endangered? Because hunting them and their Ivory was outlawed. Why are Lions thriving? Because you can pay $50,000 to kill one of them. I bet you are pissed off at Cecil the Lion getting killed? Well, guess what, Cecil is what saves the whole species. When the local population knows it will receive $50,000 for a legal hunt, a legal kill, who do you think then becomes massively incentivized to stop poachers and otherwise make sure the species thrives so they can continue to receive $50K per kill? Hunting saves species, outlawing hunting decimates them due to poachers and lack of incentive to keep the herd strong to continue to receive hunting fees.

Y. Sam

Like you I live in the Midwest but all too close to the city.

By and large the majority Dutch perspective is so different that you are essentially barking at the moon. Over there they don't have our luxury of choice regarding living in the back woods or off the grid. Then again, they don't have to deal with the every man fend for themselves mindset like we do here in the U.S.

You know well enough there's plenty of folks over here (like NYC) already who would never see the gun dilemma through the same lens as yourself. Now add an entirely different culture to the mix and . . . . well you're wasting your breath/keystrokes.

For my part I was trying to convey that because in reality our federal government doesn't belong to us and can't be trusted the only recourse some believe is their 2nd Amendment right to bare arms.

Recently Patrick Biertijd's host said "Amen" to a guest who summarily opined that the real decision makers behind the scenes are not those clowns running for office. So I believe at least some of those here are worldly enough to realize the same.

Re your WWW comment, I'm guessing the locals sometimes get tired of the foreign loiterers especially when things get political. Might be something akin to you or I hosting a site over here and then having "latino" or Arabic denizens crashing the party in their native tongue.

I don't own a gun. I don't have fighting skills.
Do I feel defenseless?
No.
Why not?
Because we're not in a war...

Good luck defending yourself against burglars with a gun. Most likely, they will shoot back at some point. I don't know if it feels comfortable to say "No one left my house unharmed" afterwards, if that accidentally includes your wife or kids.